|
Tirana, 4 September 1998
1. Introduction
Among the most serious challenges facing Albania
is the easy availability of weapons among the civilian population
due to the wide-spread looting that occurred during last years
unrest. Estimates of the number of weapons that were taken from
depots in Albania in early 1997 are in the region of 600,000.
An illegally armed population has consequences
for the ability of the state to pursue economic recovery and political
legitimization. So-far only as few as 10% of the looted weapons
has been retrieved by the government and uncounted numbers of weapons
have probably smuggled out of the country to nearby conflict areas.
Although there is a widespread commitment to the policy of weapons
collection the Government of Albania is lacking funds for a full
fledged implementation. Therefore, the Government of Albania asked
the Secretary-General of the United Nations for assistance in devising
a programme of weapons collection from the civilian population.
A mission led by Under-Secretary-General Jayantha
Dhanapala visited Albania from 11 to 14 June 1998 and concluded
that a weapons buy-back programme was not feasible mainly for economic
reasons as it would be highly inflationary to send so much money
into the Albanian economy in buying back hundreds of thousands
of weapons taken from government depots.
The mission therefore recommended to link weapons
collection programmes with development incentives benefiting communities
as a whole. It was recommended to start with a pilot project in
the Gramshi district, 200 km south of Tirana as a test case which
- depending on success- would subsequently be undertaken nation-wide.
It was also recommended that the weapons collected,
would be publicly destroyed and that the programme should be financially
supported by a group of interested states.
The Secretary-General of the United Nations decided,
in close cooperation with the UNDP to dispatch a UNDP technical
team to Albania which would further assess the feasibility of a
weapons collection pilot programme in the Gramsh district and to
devise a detailed project proposal.
Terms of reference.
The mission, in close cooperation with the civilian population in the
Gramsh District, conducted a rapid assessment of:
· the feasibility of a weapons collection programme;
· the most urgent immediate development needs;
· the feasibility of a comprehensive public awareness programme in the Gramsh
District to sensitize the population to the reasons for and benefits of such
a programme;
Following an in-depth assessment of the situation
both in the field and in consultation with the major actors at
the national level, the mission has designed both the conceptional
framework and the operational parameters of a comprehensive weapons
collection programme in the Gramsh District.
The mission has also taken into account the fact
that such programme should subsequently be target the national
level and therefore has a local and a national implementation potential.
The mission would like to stress the point that
this pilot project offering arms for development is an innovative
approach which may get a lot of attention from the international
community if it proves to be successful. There are only a few examples
to mention like the provision of sewing machines in Mozambique,
the provision of labor or jobs in return for weapons or offering
training in other countries. Most programmes offering money for
weapons ( buy-back programmes) failed because they rather created
new arms trade with weapons coming from other places than reducing
the weapons circulating among the civilian population. Also food
for weapons programmes have not created great incentives for turning-
in weapons as they were not of a income generating nature.
Thus, the effort to create a better public security
environment by strengthening the law and order capacities, together
with development actions in return for weapons could be a more
promising approach than former initiatives. However, it should
be borne in mind that there is no guarantee for success. Success
will depend highly on a timely and accurate implementation of the
project without loss of momentum in addition to sufficient financial
donor support.
2. Methodology
The team spent three days (23-25 August) in Tirana
and discussed the elements of a pilot project for weapons collection
in the Gramsh district, as recommended by the Dhanapala evaluation
mission, with government authorities, heads of international organizations
and missions present in Tirana, media, NGO's, the Albanian Development
Fund, and individuals.
The team visited the Gramsh district from 26 to
28 August and discussed the weapons for development project with
local authorities at the prefecture, district and community level
and visited also a number of villages in order to gain an understanding
of the considerations of the people about the illicit possession
of weapons the villages. From 29 August to 5 September reports
have been prepared and feed-back discussions took place with a
number of the above mentioned and other personalities.
3. Mission findings and recommendations
The Gramsh district consists of 1 municipality
(Gramsh), 9 communes and 91 villages. The total population is about
56,000 ( 10,000 families) of which 40% is located in and around
Gramsh municipality.
The mission found the overall situation in the
Gramsh district to be peaceful- notwithstanding the apparent political
dispute at the national level and sporadic incidents in the area.
It became clear to the mission that there is a general willingness
among the population at large to return weapons looted during the
riot period of March 1997. Large quantities of weapons and ammunition
have already voluntarily been turned in by the civilian population.
It is judged by the chairman of the Gramsh district that as a minimum
further 10,000 weapons could be collected in the whole of the district.
However, the mission cannot assess the appropriateness of this
estimate.
It became clear that the Dhanapala mission had
already triggered in some of the communes a further collection
of weapons possessed by the families in the villages. Thus not
only is the prevailing situation in the Gramsh district conducive
to providing support, there is also a need to keep the momentum
generated by the Dhanapala mission by ensuring earliest possible
support. One of the first priorities to be clarified is the organizational
structure, funding and funding mechanisms that are envisaged.
3.1.The public order situation
It should be stressed that there can be no development without security.
An integrated approach to security and development is needed. The civil
population has no great incentive to turn in their weapons if they
see that the local police cannot guarantee their security. So any arms
collection programme may ultimately fail if the forces tasked with
public order cannot perform their duties. The mission observed that
in Gramsh a dual track approach is needed. Weapon collection needs
to be accompanied by a strengthening of the capabilities of the district
police.
The lack of resources available to the police
was a common complaint not only expressed by the head of the police
in the Gramsh district but by also all the chairman of the 9 communes.
The police force in the Gramsh district consist of 150 persons.(
26 officers, 42 non commissioned officers, 68 policemen and 15
civilians)
Manpower as such is not a problem. It is more
a problem of the use of the available manpower in the light of
the shortage of equipment.
Apart from a brand-new police station the Gramsh
police force lacks the most basic equipment such as 4-wheel drive
cars, communications, transportable forensic equipment. Commune
leaders informed the mission that in a number of communes no police
showed up for months. The relationship between police and the civilian
population seems to be good: most policemen are from the region.
[Based on estimates by the Head of Gramsh Police a budget of about
US$ 205,100 is needed for the provision with the above mentioned
equipment.]
An assistance programme for the police should,
besides the provision of equipment, include additional training
in the democratic application of the law. The low remuneration
for the police is another factor of concern which may lead to a
breakdown in discipline and to incidents where the security forces
become a part of lawlessness rather than part of the solution.
The mission understands, however, that the problem of salaries
cannot be solved on a local basis.
3.2.The socio-economic aspects of the project.
The mission was informed about the difficult socio-economic situation
in the Gramsh district. The mission observed that the rural infrastructure
in all the 9 communes is very poor indeed. In a number of communes
there are no rural roads connecting villages to the Commune center.
Based on a rough estimate there is a need for road reconstruction and
road repair of about 90 km.[ At a price estimate of US$ 20,000/ 28,000
per km, costs are in the region of US$ 1,8 million/ 2,5 million.]
A number of schools were destroyed during the
disturbances, others need repair and there is a general lack of
education material. District chairman indicated that 10 schools
needed to be repaired [at a cost of US$ 10,000 each.] Health care
is virtually non existent at the village and commune level and
if some medical support is available it cannot be reached by the
remote villages. Ambulances are not available and if they were,
they could not be used in most parts of the region due to the lack
of rural roads.
Also drinking water and sanitation facilities
are scarce throughout Gramsh district. However, most community
leaders expressed the view that the overall priority is the improvement
of the rural infrastructure. Such an improvement, in parallel with
strengthening of the capacities for public order, is undoubtedly
a major incentive for a weapon collection programme.
Last but not least, the mission was informed by
the local authorities that they badly needed a telephone or cheap
radio-relay system up to the commune level. It was indicated that
one cheap radio relay system [at a price of US 20,000] would cover
20 villages. [With 91 villages in the Gramsh district this amounts
for about US$ 100,000]
The mission is of the opinion that in the light
of the priorities expressed by the people themselves the earliest
possible implementation of a rural road and social infrastructure
programme would be the best incentive for the surrendering of arms.
However, people in the region observed, and that is also the opinion
of the mission, that public order is also a basic asset in a peace
building programme. Therefore, it is recommended that the provision
of funds be targeted to three components, namely strengthening
the capacities of the police, a rural road and social infrastructure
system, and a public telephone and/or radio relay system connecting
the district to all nine communes.1 Separate agreements
will have to be concluded with each community, while not every
commune may have the same priorities.
The earliest possible start of the above programmes
will be of paramount importance for the weapon collection operation.
The mission understands that it will take time before such a comprehensive
programme will be fully funded. With the limited financial means
at present available, a comprehensive approach, embracing all the
9 communities at the same time, is not possible without additional
donor support. However, it will probably take some time before
contributions of interested donors will be available and definite
commitments can be made. In order not to lose the momentum the
mission recommends a phased approach, starting with say one or
two communes in the Gramsh district. Priority regarding which commune(s)
should come first should be decided by the local actors, in collaboration
with the UNDP project manager, and be based on the immediate available
funds. The mission understands that UNDP may be able to provide
immediately the necessary funds for some public order support and
one commune, to start with. It goes without saying that the first
tranche of the proposed public awareness programme ( see chapter
3.7.) should be implemented in parallel with the above projects.
3.3. Some general observations regarding the development
activities of the Pilot project
· The execution / implementation modality has not yet been decided upon. It is
clear, however, that there will be a range of national capacity building requirements
among the involved national partners. Considering that the objective is to progressively
turn this into a national programme it is therefore vital that capacity building
activities are built into the programme from the very beginning. Such activities
should be related to any type of national partner - be it Government or civil
society.
· As part of Albania's general development priorities, it is likely that various
sector ministries have development projects under planning and/or preparation
for the target area. It will be important that Government, in endorsing and moving
ahead with this joint UN-Govt. programme, guarantees the required inter-ministerial
coordination to ensure that such planned projects are NOT launched at a time
and in such a form that it causes problems for the overall aim of this joint
Govt-UN programme. This could mean that in some cases sector ministries would
need to await that the first phase is implemented before launching their projects.
This has the added advantage that strategies tested and lessons learnt from this
programme can be fed into other Government sectoral programmes in the same area
thereby considerably expanding the medium term impact.
3.4. Trust fund
In order to channel possible donor participation, the establishment of
a special Trust fund for the Pilot programme should be considered,
dedicated to the provision of security assistance for the district
police and for the arms collection and development projects in the
remaining communes in the Gramsh district.
The main purpose for such a fund is to streamline,
otherwise complex bureaucratic procedures and speed up implementation
of the weapons collection programme. The Trust fund would be open
to any contributions from internal and external (donor) sources.
It could be used to attract donations from sources, such as the
private sector, charity agencies and international organizations.
The Trust fund should operate under responsibility of UNDP. Participation
by donors in the Trust fund will - as experienced in other countries-
enhance the momentum of this kind of processes. The mission would
like to emphasize that if early and substantial donor support cannot
be realized it will not be possible to implement the whole project
with serious consequences for its credibility.
3.5.The weapons collection operation
Large military weapon depots were situated in the Gramsh military district
together with a weapon factory. The mission learned that weapons and
ammunition are now relocated in two main weapon depots which seem to
be now adequately protected.
Substantial numbers of weapons and ammunition
have already been voluntarily collected from the civilian population
during the first rounds of weapon collection by special collection
teams organized by the district authorities. A number of these
weapons have already been returned to the military depots and others
are stored in the police headquarters in Gramsh. During the first
rounds of voluntary weapons collection by the local authorities,
reportedly, about 4000 weapons, including automatic weapons, rifles,
machine guns, anti-tank weapons, anti-aircraft machine guns, mortars,
grenade launchers and large quantities of ammunitions, including
hand grenades, anti-tank grenades and over 12 million rounds of
ammunition have been turned in. According to estimates by the District
chairman and the Police Commissioner roughly at least 10,000 weapons
are still in the hands of the households in the district.2 The
table below gives an impression of the concentration of weapons
in the Gramsh district.
LEVEL OF CONCENTRATION OF THE ARMAMENTS -
|
Municipality/
Commune
|
Number
of Villages
|
Number
of Families
|
Number
of
Inhabitants
|
Existing
Depot on the Commune or
in Periphery
|
Weapons
Collecting
Campaign
Initiated
by Police
|
Motivation
of detention of the weapons by the inhabitants
|
Expressed
Possibilities of Recovery
|
|
GRAMSH
TOWN
|
|
3600
|
16,000
|
Cekreze
+
Cekin
|
Yes
|
Traffic
+ self-protection
|
Unknown
|
|
PISHAJ
|
20
|
1600
|
8700
|
Cekreze
+ Selte
|
No
|
Traffic
+ self-protection
|
>1600
|
|
SKENDERBEGAS
|
13
|
770
|
3300
|
Non
|
Yes
|
Self-protection
|
800+Ammunitions
|
|
POROCAN
|
5
|
780
|
3000
|
Selte
|
No
|
Self-protection
|
800+Ammunitions
|
|
KUSHOVE
|
8
|
460
|
2200
|
Non
|
No
|
Traffic+self-protection
|
>1000
+ Ammunitions
|
|
SULT
|
9
|
450
|
2500
|
Non
|
No
|
Self-protection
|
>1000
|
|
TUNJE
|
12
|
800
|
4000
|
Non
|
No
|
Self-protection
|
800
|
|
LENIE
|
6
|
500
|
3300
|
Teqa
+ Molla Graboves
|
Yes
|
Traffic
+ Self-protection
|
>500
+ Ammunitions + Explosives
|
|
KODOVJAT
|
12
|
1200
|
6000
|
Yes
in Periphery
|
Yes
in 8 Villages
|
Traffic
+ Self-protection
|
>1200
|
|
KUKUR
|
10
|
1100
|
5300
|
Cekreze
|
Yes
|
Traffic
+ Self-protection
|
1500
+ Ammunitions
|
Source ADF
As long as the capacities of the police are not
strengthened and the public security situation remains unstable
it was suggested that in remote villages, the village chief might
keep, legally registered, say 3-5 weapons in a safe place for self-defense.
This would greatly contribute to the voluntary collection of surplus
weapons. The mission supports this approach because in the light
of the difficult geographical situation police cannot be always
timely present in such remote areas.
The weapon collection process could best be organized
at the commune level. As soon as in the commune concerned, development
elements of the project are agreed upon and funding has been secured,
the collection process will start. Collection must be completed
before implementation of the development project commence and should
not last longer than one to two weeks. Collected weapons and ammunition
should preferably be destroyed on the spot to avoid complicated
transport problems. An additional advantage of the proposed phased
weapons collection is that weapon collection can start at short
notice, pending approval by the Albanian Government and UNDP/New
York. Taking into account a one years programme, collection and
destruction in the first commune(s) could take place in November
1998.
In this period road conditions in the Gramsh district
may slow down the speed of the arms collection operation. In the
winter period several villages will be isolated from the commune
centers, making it impossible to transport weapons by car. Weapons
and ammunition may have to be brought downhill to the commune center
by donkeys or carried by hand.
3.6. Weapon destruction
The Government of Albania already acknowledged its intention to destroy
most of the recovered weapons to Under Secretary Dhanapala during his
visit in June 1998. He was told that the Government is committed to
destroy most of the weapons it collects, partly because it believes
that these are outmoded and unsuited for a modernized national security
apparatus and to assure those who are concerned that the retrieved
weapons may be held by the Government to be used for its own purposes.
As a first step Albania has already discontinued domestic manufacture
of weapons.
The mission learned from the Deputy Minister of
Defense that with respect to the destruction of the collected weapons,
in particular those which cannot be used anymore, may be destroyed
publicly in the context of the Pilot project.
The mission suggests that the government may invite
international observers to verify the collection and destruction
of the collected weapons.
3.7. The public awareness campaign.
In the course of the mission the team met with various media officials
in Albania who concurred with the view that disarmament is an urgent
national priority and that they would therefore pledge their full collaboration
and support for an arms awareness information effort in support of
the planned weapons collection project in Gramsh, together with a national
campaign to raise the awareness level of the overall population regarding
disarmament. Indeed it was felt that the two elements would be mutually
supporting and would have a multiplier effect, the success of the local
project in Gramsh becoming a possible example for a similar effort
in other regions and ultimately embracing all districts of Albania.
Given communication patterns in the country,
the mission recommends that the two main communication vectors,
together with the written media, will be the televison and radio
operating in a coordinated and mutually supporting manner.
The mission learned that while it is felt that
the present radio coverage in the district of Gramsh- both in MW
and FM- is sufficient to commence an information effort, additional
equipment would certainly improve radio reception in the remote
villages.
Television coverage in Gramsh district now only
impacts about 80 % of the population and reception is poor even
in some parts of the city itself. In order to improve reception
quality and to restore reception to some 95 % of the population,
three 2 W relay stations would have to be procured.
From the above it appears that the provision of
some relay stations would have the immediate effect of raising
FM and TV reception to close to 95% of the population. Such an
improvement, coming as part of a weapons collection operation would
have an instant positive effect on a population for which radio
and television are the only sources of both news and entertainment.
As regards implementation of the public awareness
programme the mission suggest a step by step approach, to be expanded
and adjusted as the weapons collection program proceeds. Public
awareness should commence slightly prior to the first actual collection
programme. While all the details of such an awareness programme
cannot all be anticipated it will have to closely follow developments
regarding arms collection and, if necessary, anticipate them. Therefore,
the mission recommends:
· Early identification of a programme coordinator, based in Tirana, for the awareness
aspects of the pilot project.
· A half day familiarization workshop in Tirana for radio and television journalists
from Tirana and the region.
· Startup of the radio and television awareness campaign implementation at the
national level by the increase of news items.
· Provision of technical support to the Radio and TV in Tirana and Gramsh (light
equipment, some relay stations for Gramsh, funding for local coverage, etc.)
· Expansion of the media efforts in Gramsh in parallel with the collection process
through involvement of other groups (teachers, children etc.) and of other vectors
(T-shirts, etc.) at the Gramsh level.
· High media coverage of the actual weapon collection programmes in the Gramsh
district.
The mission believes that, given the current psychological
climate in the country, an awareness campaign in parallel with
weapons collection and development assistance will play a major
role in addressing the aims of the Pilot programme. As Gramsh being
the target area a specific programme should be started in Gramsh
using means adapted to the local situation. The mission recommends
to provide at short notice for a mobile information team which
will cover all the 9 communes. The team will operate for say one
month and require one 4-wheel drive vehicle with a mounted loud
speaker installation. [The mission estimates the initial costs
for the public awareness campaign at about US$ 30,000 ( first 3
months) followed by an additional US$ 54700 for the programme as
a whole.]
4. The involvement of NGO's
Based on international experiences and in view
of the existence of a number of NGO's in Albania the mission recommends
that national NGO's such as, Association for Disarmament, Association
of Women, Association for the Protection against harm for Weapons,
The Association for Conflict Solution, The Independent Forum of
Albanian Women, The Association "Anti-Mines Friends, should be
encouraged to participate in this pilot project. Also with respect
tot the development element of the pilot project the involvement
of both national and international NGO's should be assessed. At
present , only national NGO's are working in the Gramsh district.
5. Recommended organizational structures
The mission has been informed that a new law on
the collection of weapons and military ammunition has recently
been approved by parliament. The law regulates both the voluntary
surrender and obligatory collection of weapons, the registration
of weapons as well as measures which help the strengthening of
the public order and crime prevention. Care should be taken that
the UNDP pilot project and the new regulations will be mutually
supportive. The law on the Collection of Weapons and Military Ammunition
of 5 August 1998, includes the establishment of a Central Commission
for the Collection of Weapons, chaired by the deputy Prime minister.3 The
law dictates that also a Commission for Weapons Collection will
be established at prefecture4 and district level.
The members of the local commissions will be appointed by the prefect,
following where possible, the same structure of the prefecture
commissions.
The mission would like to emphasize that it is
impossible to have simultaneously a pilot project, based on voluntary
weapons surrender, and a policy of coercive weapons confiscation
in the Gramsh district. Such an approach would seriously damage
the credibility of the pilot project.
Therefore it is recommended that the Government
Commission for the Collection of Weapons at the district level
will not be made operational for the duration of the Pilot project.
The mission assumes that UNDP will provide overall coordination
for programming and implementation of the various activities within
the pilot project.
The mission recommends a bottom-up management
structure, with steering groups at the level of the communes and
the district. These groups will be involved in both the choice
of projects and the actual collection of weapons and ammunition.
It is important that close cooperation be established between these
groups, the field manager of the UNDP Pilot project, and the above
mentioned governmental commissions.
The mission recommends that a field project unit
be located in Gramsh or Elbasan, with overall responsibilities
for the pilot project as a whole. Based on international experience
the unit manager could best be recruited from abroad. He will be
seconded by a national weapon collection expert ( retired officer),
a development specialist and a part-time public awareness campaign
coordinator, based in Tirana. [ Estimated costs for fielding the
office for 1 year: $ 100,000.]
6. Involvement of other international organizations
and missions
The mission met with representatives of a number
of international organizations and missions present in Tirana.
The mission observed that a number of activities already in process
in the field of security assistance and weapons control could perhaps
be implemented in the context of the pilot project. OSCE is assisting
the government in building the judicial system. In this context
support for awareness campaigns, seminars on police/civilian relations
and weapons collections could be envisaged. Head of the OSCE presence
in Albania indicated that some funds are available in support of
such programmes. European Union's phare programme includes a programme
to improve the logistics of the Albanian police.5 Under
the partnership for Peace programme(PfP), NATO may be interested
to take part in the weapons collection and ammunition destruction
programmes. Several bilateral programmes, such as to a relocation
of the weapon and ammunition depots and destruction of ammunition
(Italy, Germany) and training of media people (Switzerland) are
running. There may be others- not known to this mission- involved
in programmes which could be related to the pilot project.
For the development activities it will be necessary
to assess how various UN agencies can become partners, whether
in the field (development) activities or, in the broader capacity
building required for the successful implementation of the programme.
The mission recommends that as soon as possible
a round table be organized with all those interested in the UNDP
pilot project to investigate possibilities for cooperation under
the umbrella of this project.
7. Project strategy and implementation
Based on the above analysis the following project
strategy and project implementation has been developed.
The project strategy will consist of the voluntarily
weapons collection through a "weapons for development" philosophy,
targeting a pilot district.
The recent governmental law on Disarmament, being
somewhat in conflict with the above said philosophy, should not
be applied to the pilot project district. This compromise is a
pre-condition for the project implementation and the achievement
of the expected results/outcomes.
The weapons collection operation envisaged in
the project should include a main component consisting of development
interventions resulting from a demand driven and a bottom up approach.
The weapons collection operation and development
aspects should be preceded and accompanied by a strong public awareness
campaign at the district/prefecture and national level and accompanied
by a substantial assistance to the strengthening of the public
order at the district level.
The weapons collection operation itself should
precede and take place right before the start of development interventions
implementation.
The public awareness campaign should accompany
the whole process for intensifying the impact of the pilot project
within and outside the project area.
A resource mobilization campaign should start
simultaneously with the project approval and be kept operational
during project implementation.
Project implementation
It is clear that the present situation has been provoked by a series
of interrelated social, political and economic factors. Therefore,
the project, aiming at identifying an appropriate solution for re-establishing
stability, will inevitably be confronted with complex matters. For
a sound and successful implementation, the project needs to collaborate
with a wide number of actors and be as transparent as possible.
UNDP will provide overall coordination for the
project implementation, a project unit will be established at the
district level.
The project unit will closely collaborate with
the government commission for disarmament at the prefecture and
district level, the steering committees that may be established
at the communes and district level in light of project implementation,
the district political parties' branches, the local NGO/CBO's,
the order and military forces at the district level, as well as
with the media at the local and national level. In addition, the
project unit will directly monitor the progress of the weapons
collection operation and the implementation of the development
activities in case a different implementing agency would have been
identified.
The project unit will closely and continuously
be in touch with UNDP, being the project interface for coordination
of activities with the National Disarmament Commission, Ministry
of Defense, Ministry of Interior etc.
Actions
The following sequence of actions is proposed:
1. Circulation of this draft report in Gramsh and Tirana for comments
and inputs.
2. Organization of a round table in Tirana as mentioned above.
3. The organization of a workshop in Gramsh to discuss ways and means
for the practical implementation of the pilot project.( preparing priority
list communities, organization of steering committees, time tables, sequence
of activities, organizational aspects, etc.) We recommend that UNDP sponsor
and organize this workshop together with the District local authorities
and interested NGO's.
4. The organization of a conference on arms control in Albania in the
context of the national public awareness campaign with the presence of
foreign experts on arms collection. At the conference the new Albanian
Arms control Law and the pilot project in Gramsh could be presented.
The mission learned that such a conference coincides with a already planned
conference by the Albanian Atlantic Association. The mission recommends
that this conference be cosponsored by UNDP if it is agreed by the Atlantic
Association to organize this conference in the context of the Pilot project.
5. The immediate establishment of the project unit for the Pilot project.
6. To start the public awareness campaign as suggested above in parallel
with the weapon collection in the first commune(s) to be chosen.
Tentative time schedule
September 1998
· Round table with interested international organizations ( OSCE, EU, World bank,
PfP, Maape, individual countries, etc.) to assess possibilities for cooperation/participation
in pilot project.
· Formal approval pilot project proposal by Government of Albania and UNDP/New
York
· Establishing organizational and coordination structure between Government and
UNDP
October 1998
· Recruiting personnel for project management, including public awareness project
and organization management in Gramsh · Fielding project unit
· Organizing technical workshop in Gramsh
· Organizing media workshop in Tirana, with participation of local media from
Tirana and Gramsh
· Establishing steering committees in communes of Gramsh district
· Fielding UNDP project unit.
November 1998
· Collection of weapons in the priority commune(s)
· Destruction ceremony
· Start of development project, pending weather conditions
· Providing Police Gramsh district with (the first tranche of) assistance means
( cooperation with EU - PHARE programme )
December 1998, etc.
Continuation of the programme
8. Follow on
The pilot project will last one year. Subject
to a successful outcome it will be necessary to decide on a continuation
in other districts ultimately covering the whole of Albania. The
most obvious approach would than be to chose one or more adjacent
districts of the same prefecture and continue the process with
the experience gained. Another possibility may be to integrate
weapon collection programmes in the Government's development plans.
9. Evaluation
Six months after the start of the pilot project
an evaluation should be made regarding the success rate of the
project. Rather than counting numbers of collected weapons and
ammunition, the emphasis should be on the public order situation
compared to the situation before the pilot project.
The law and order situation could be judged by
an evaluation team which could observe the situation on the spot
in discussions with citizens and local authorities, through statistical
comparisons with other districts and through analysis of the crime
rates trends in the Gramsh district.
10. Summary of recommendations
10.1.
A weapons for development project can only be realized if a relatively
stable security situation exists. The mission recommends that a dual-track
approach be developed: the weapon collection process needs to be accompanied
by a substantial strengthening of the capacities of the police in the
Gramsh district.
10.2.
The Weapons collection and development operation should be preceded and
accompanied by a strong public awareness campaign at the district/prefect
and national level. At short notice, a mobile information team should
be organized to inform the communes on the spot about the pilot project.
10.3.
In light of priorities expressed by the people in Gramsh district the
provision of funds should be targeted to three components: 1). strengthening
capacities of the police, 2) infrastructure intervention ( including
social infrastructure) 3) the establishment of a cheap communication
system, connecting the communes to the district. However, in agreements
with individual communes, other priorities may be identified and agreed
upon.
10.4.
To keep momentum, and taking into account the limited immediate available
financial means, the mission recommends a phased approach, starting
with one or two communes.
10.5.
Without substantial early donor participation the full project cannot
be realized. A special Trust fund for donor participation should be
established to this effect.
10.6.
Weapon collection should be organized at the commune level. Collection
should precede and take place right before the start of development
implementation. Collection operations should not last longer than one
or two weeks in the communes concerned.
10.7.
Collected weapons and ammunition should be publicly destroyed on the
spot.
10.8.
National NGO's should be encouraged to participate in the pilot project.
10.9.
A bottom-up management structure with steering groups at the commune
and district level should be established, tasked with both the choice
of projects and the actual collection of weapons and ammunition.
10.10.
A UNDP field project unit should be located in Gramsh or Elbasan, with
overall project responsibility.
10.11.
Close cooperation need to be established between the governmental weapons
collection commissions, the district steering group and the UNDP field
project unit.
10.12.
Involvement of international organizations, missions and individual countries,
present in Albania, should be actively sought. A round table should
be organized at short notice with all those interested in the pilot
project to investigate possibilities for cooperation and early implementation.
10.13.
A technical workshop should be organized in Gramsh to discuss ways and
means for the implementation of the pilot project (establishing priorities,
organizational aspects, establishment steering committees, sequence
of activities, etc.)
10.14.
The Albanian Atlantic Association has already planned an arms control
conference in Tirana in October next. It is recommended that this conference
be organized in the context of the pilot project. If this is the case,
UNDP could co-sponsor this conference.
10.15.
As part of Albania's general development priorities it is likely that
various sector ministries have development projects under planning
and/or preparation for the target area. It will be important that Government,
in endorsing and moving ahead with this joint UN-Govt. programme, guarantees
that such planned projects are not launched at a time and in such a
form that it causes problems for the overall aim of the Pilot programme.
10.16.
Close coordination between Albanian Development Fund ( ADF ) and UNDP
is important to ensure that projects in the same area mutually support
each other.
Tirana, 4 September 1998
Brigadier-General (ret) Henny J. van der Graaf
Consultant
*****************************
1 The exact needs may be reshaped
after further discussions with the local population and the findings
of the Alabanian Development Fund, who conducted a detailed needs
assessment.
2 The mission would like to stress
the point that any judgement about numbers of weapons illegally
circulating and numbers which may already be smuggled out of the
region are purely speculative.
3 Members of the National Commission
for the Collection of Weapons are: Minister of Public Order, Minister
of Defense, Head of SHIK, Army Chief General Staff, Director General
of Police, Director General of Local Government.
4 The Prefecture Commission for
Weapons Collection consist of: Prefect (chairman), Prefecture Police
Directors, Heads of district councils, Mayors, commanders of military
units.
5 Delegate of the European Commission
in Albania informed the mission that, among others, 35 4-wheel
drives and uniforms will be handed over to the Albanian Police.

|