FOR
PERSONAL, NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY
UN Press Release
April 23, 2002
Annan
Urges States To Ratify ICC Statute
Annan urges States to ratify war crimes court's statute, as preparatory panel
ends session
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan19 April - As the preparatory body laying the
groundwork for the world's first permanent war crimes court wrapped up its
latest session today, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan praised the speedy ratifications of the Rome Statute
and expressed hope that the tribunal would be functioning by mid-2003.
"Now with the unusually rapid entry of the Statute into force, we are witnessing
a great victory for justice, and for world order - a turn away from the rule
of brute force, and towards the rule of law," the Secretary-General said in his statement to the ninth session of the Preparatory
Commission for the International Criminal Court.
Last week, 10 countries deposited their instruments of ratification with the
United Nations, bringing to 66 the total number of approvals, six more than
is needed to bring the Rome Statute into force on 1 July.
In his remarks today, Mr. Annan urged the remaining 73
signatories to the Rome Statute to ratify the accord as
soon as possible. "Indeed, ultimately
all States should become parties to the Statute," he said. "As I
said in Rome last week, the best defence against evil will be a Court in which
every country plays its part."
Since the treaty was adopted in July 1998 in Rome, the Commission has had the
task of negotiating the practical and technical arrangements necessary to allow
the Court to function.
At this latest session at UN Headquarters in New York, the Commission was in
the last stages of negotiations on the final remaining issues, including a
first-year budget for the Court and administrative and financial matters connected
to the initial meeting of the Assembly of States Parties, now expected to take
place in September in The Hague.
The Commission also dealt with arrangements for the nomination and election
procedure for judges, the prosecutor and the registrar, as well as their remuneration;
and a trust fund for victims and witnesses. In addition, final details were being worked out concerning the
principles that should govern the headquarters agreement with the Host Country
of the Court, the Netherlands.
Rome, Italy, 11 April 2002 - Press conference with President Carlo Ciampi following
ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
Secretary-General's opening statement:
Thank you, President Ciampi,
About an hour ago, in New York, representatives of 10 States deposited their
instruments ratifying the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,
bringing the total to 66.
By so doing, they took us past the threshold of sixty ratifications needed
for the Statute to enter into force.
The long-held dream of a permanent international criminal court will now be
realised. Impunity has been dealt a decisive blow.
I am delighted to be in Rome for this historic event, because it was here that
the Conference leading to the adoption of the Statute was held.
I shall never forget being in the Campidoglio, on 18 July 1998, to witness
some of the first signatures being affixed. And Mr. President, you were there
with me.
A missing link in the international justice system is now in place. For a long
time we have had the International Court of Justice, which deals with disputes
between States. But until now we had no permanent international court where
individuals could be put on trial.
The establishment of the new Court will fill that gap.
The Statute will now come into force on the first of July -- less than four
years after it was adopted. By next year the Court should be up and running.
Those who commit war crimes, genocide or other crimes against humanity will
no longer be beyond the reach of justice. Humanity will be able to defend itself
-- responding to the worst of human nature with one of the greatest achievements: the rule of law.
I thank the Italian government and people for all they have done to bring this
about.
I congratulate the 66 States that have now ratified the Statute.
I urge those who have not done so to follow their example. The best defence
against evil will be a Court in which every country plays its part. And let
me repeat, the best defence against evil will be a
Court in which every country plays its part.
And I thank the many non-governmental organisations whose tireless efforts
contributed to this success.
The time is at last coming when humanity no longer has to bear impotent witness
to the worst atrocities, because those tempted to commit such crimes will know
that justice awaits them.
Let us make the International Criminal Court an effective instrument. Let it
be a deterrent to the wicked, and a ray of hope for the innocent and the helpless.
Thank you very much.
Questions and Answers:
Q: [translated from Italian] I would like to address a question to the Secretary-General
of the United Nations. What do you think will be done over the next few months,
and also, with regard to the upcoming deadlines for the International Criminal
Court, in other words, what do you think will be done to overcome the reservations
of some countries -
China, Israel, the United States - for example? We all have certain expectations in connection with this Court, and there may
be delays because of these reservations, and as President Ciampi has already
said, we are worried about what is happening now
in the Middle East, and therefore we would like to ask you, Mr. Annan, if there
are any new initiatives being considered, new initiatives with regard to the
deployment of UN observers, for example, in the region?
SG: Let me, on the first question, say that we shall go ahead and establish
the Court. I hope the Court will be up and running, as I said, by next year.
The vast majority of nations in the world have signed on to the Court. We have 66 ratifications as I said today and we need
only 60 to go ahead and establish the Court.
I know there are countries who have reservations and have indicated they will
not sign on. But I think it should not hold back those countries that are determined
to go ahead and ensure that this missing link in international law is established.
I also believe that those who today are not enthusiastic will over time come
to recognize the importance and the usefulness of the Court. And some in fact
may need it more than those who have already ratified it, and so I am not worried
about establishment of the Court. We will go ahead and do it, and I hope others
who today have reservations will join one day. This happened before and it
can happen for this one.
On the question of the Middle East, we are all awaiting with expectation the
visit and the mission of Secretary of State Powell. It is not an easy mission.
It is an extremely delicate and complicated mission. The fighting continues.
The Security Council resolutions are clear, but there doesn't seem to be any
indications to implement them. We need to maintain the pressure, and hope to
get the parties to respect these resolutions. The international community
has finally come together and we are speaking with one voice, with one objective
and one
purpose, and I think that was made abundantly clear from the communiqué in
Madrid yesterday, and also the support that the Security Council gave to that communiqué. I think the parties,
left to themselves, cannot resolve this conflict. We have seen what has happened
in the last 18 months. They do need third
party assistance and I think we should press ahead and provide that assistance.
Q: Mr. President, Mr. Annan, [inaudible] from AFP, when the International Court
is functioning, can you perceive either side in the Middle East conflict facing
charges?
SG: That is a highly speculative area I don't want to
be drawn into. Obviously, the Court will be established to be
able to put individuals on trial, individuals
who have committed crimes against
humanity, genocide, as I listed here, and whether somebody will bring charges
against anybody in the region is a question for the future to answer, and
I would prefer not to speculate.
Spokesman: We now have a question from New York. Thank you very much Mr. Secretary-General,
the question will be asked by Bill Varner of Bloomberg News.
Q: Mr. Secretary-General, what would you say to U.S. congressional concerns
that the Court could be used to prosecute U.S. servicemen overseas or diplomats,
in other words, political prosecutions?
SG: The Court is not directed against citizens
from any particular country. The Court is directed against criminals,
and the Court will prosecute in situations
where the country concerned is either unable or unwilling to prosecute. Countries with good judicial systems, who apply
the rule of law and prosecute criminals and do it promptly and fairly need
not fear. It is where they fail that the Court steps in, so there is a principle
of complementarity here, and this will be my answer to those who are concerned
about this. I don't think this is a Court that is going to run amok, intrusive,
and take on cases which are before national courts. So I hope you can pass
on the answer.
|