FOR
PERSONAL, NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY
Human Rights Watch / Bulgarian Helsinki Committee
July 16, 2002
Bulgaria:
Weapons Trade To Be Restrained
Joint Human Rights Watch and Bulgarian Helsinki Committee
Statement
(New York, July
16, 2002) - Anticipated legal reforms in Bulgaria mark an important
step toward improved control over the arms trade, Human Rights
Watch and the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee said today. The
Bulgarian parliament is expected to vote shortly to adopt changes
to the country's law on the foreign trade in weapons.
Passage of the
reforms is a key priority for the Bulgarian government, which
has acknowledged that failure to adopt the legislation could
derail Bulgaria's bid to join NATO and the European Union.
NATO is expected to announce invitations to new members at
a summit to be held in November.
"The Bulgarian
government has recognized that it has to bring its arms trade
under control if it wants to be seen as a reliable international
partner," said Lisa Misol, researcher with the Arms Division
of Human Rights Watch and author of a 1999 report on Bulgaria's
arms trade. "It has to take responsibility for checking
arms deals thoroughly, both before and after the sale, to make
sure its weapons don't wind up in the wrong hands."
Human Rights Watch
analyzed the key provisions of the pending legislation, as
well as the status of Bulgaria's ongoing reform efforts, in
a detailed briefing paper circulated to Bulgarian members of
parliament earlier this month, in partnership with the Bulgarian
Helsinki Committee.
(The July 3, 2002, letter to parliamentarians and briefing paper are available
in English at http://hrw.org/press/2002/07/bulg.htm and http://hrw.org/backgrounder/arms/bulg.htm.
The documents are available in Bulgarian at http://hrw.org/bulgarian/2002/letter.htm
and http://hrw.org/bulgarian/2002/brief.htm.)
The briefing paper
highlighted that the legislation, if adopted without changes,
would:
- Give
greater emphasis to international standards on arms transfers,
providing a tool to promote compliance with agreed minimum
export criteria Bulgaria has pledged to follow, such as those
contained in the 1998 European Union Code of Conduct. The
change would not, however, make those commitments binding
on the government.
- Impose new controls
on the activities of arms brokers. These would cover both
Bulgarian and foreign brokers, as well as transport agents
and those involved in financing arms deals, and in the case
of Bulgarian brokers would also apply to arms deals arranged
outside the country.
- Clarify and
strengthen regulatory controls to prevent diversion of weapons
shipments to unauthorized destinations.
The briefing paper
also said the legislation was incomplete in some respects.
It:
- Does not provide
for sufficient transparency or parliamentary oversight. The
government is to prepare an annual report on implementation
of the new law and will share it with parliament, but need
not make the report public.
- Does not establish
rules tailored to address the trade in surplus weapons. As
Bulgaria undertakes military reforms tied to its NATO aspirations,
it is dumping aging Soviet-standard weapons it no longer
needs. While some surplus small arms and ammunition have
begun to be destroyed, the bulk of Bulgaria's surplus weapons
continue to be available for export.
- Fails to eliminate
conflicts of interest that permit government officials with
responsibility over arms licensing decisions to serve on
the boards of arms companies. Bulgaria's foreign minister
recently stepped down from the board of a major arms manufacturing
company in the wake of allegations of illegal arms trafficking
by the company.
- Passage of legal
reforms is now imminent, but that alone won't guarantee that
Bulgaria's arms trade will finally be cleaned up," said
Krassimir Kanev, chairman of the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee. "The
government also needs to show it's serious about fully implementing
the controls and prosecuting violators."
The Bulgarian Helsinki
Committee and Human Rights Watch cited a recent case in which
Bulgaria sold a 6-gun battery of 130mm artillery pieces to
the government of Chad in 2001. The deal was reported in Bulgaria's
submission to the United Nations arms register, which tracks
only transfers of heavy weapons. The government of Chad has
a poor human rights record and armed conflict in the north
waged on for years before a shaky peace settlement was signed
in January.
In addition, Chad
recently was implicated in suspected illicit arms deliveries
to Liberia, which is under a U.N. embargo. A U.N. report issued
in April indicates that suspected arms flights to Liberia in
February this year were chartered by the government of Chad
and departed from that country's capital.
There are also
concerns that anticipated oil revenues to the government of
Chad could be used to procure more weapons, which would violate
the terms of a World Bank agreement financing a new oil pipeline.
Both human rights
groups called on Bulgarian authorities to investigate to make
sure Bulgarian-supplied weapons were not diverted or misused
by the government of Chad. They also said Bulgaria should weigh
very carefully any future arms contracts with the country.
"The Bulgarian
government has promised repeatedly not to sell weapons to human
rights abusers, areas of violent conflict, and recipients who
may divert the weapons," said Kanev. "These legal
reforms are welcome, but given the long track record of objectionable
arms deals, we need to keep a close eye on the country's arms
trade."
Human Rights Watch's
1999 report on Bulgaria's arms trading practices is available
online at http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/bulgaria/.
Copies in Bulgarian can be requested from the Bulgarian Helsinki
Committee.
|