IANSA logo
about iansa header - no link
Home | About Us | Regions | Key Issues | Resources | Events & Campaigns | Media | What's New | Women's Portal

 
Home

South America

Disarmament Statute

Gun Free Marches boom in Brazil

Campaigns
 
 
 
New gun laws in Brazil: a victory for civil society
Important reforms to national gun laws are currently underway in Brazil, a country that is both an important arms producer and seriously victimized by gun violence. On 23 October, the new law passed in the House of Representatives and now awaits final approval in the Senate. Civil society organizations such as Sou da Paz (São Paulo), Convive (Brasília) and Viva Rio (Rio de Janeiro) had an important role in advocating for tighter gun laws. In an exclusive interview with IANSA, Dr. Antônio Rangel Bandeira, Coordinator of the Arms Control project at Viva Rio and experienced political advocate, gives his perspective on NGO contributions to these efforts.

IANSA: Please explain the process (past and future) behind the new gun laws. When do you think the legislation will go into effect?

Bandeira: The proposed legislation, called the Disarmament Statute, was developed by a bi-cameral commission formed by key members of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Their task was to incorporate suggestions from the nearly 60 proposals for new gun laws that had been presented over the years but had remained “frozen” due to pressure from the gun lobby. The bill passed by consensus in the Senate on July 23rd of this year. Then it went to the House of Representatives, where it had to go through two different Congressional commissions. The first -- the Public Security Commission, which is quite pro gun -- made changes that significantly weakened the law, but the original text was restored in the second, the Justice and Constitution Commission.

On October 23rd, the law was approved in a plenary vote in the House of Representatives, and must now return to the Senate. We believe it will receive final approval there sometime in November. If popular pressure continues to trump the minority view of the pro-gun lobby, they new law could be in force before the year’s end.

Part of our efforts now are to make sure that the law won’t get stuck in a filing cabinet somewhere, make sure that it remains on the agenda and is voted before the upcoming holidays. We know that the gun lobby would like to stall as long as possible, to give themselves a chance to undermine the popular support that we have been building over the years. President Lula will have the final word, and he has been supportive of tighter gun legislation, and of the Disarmament Statute.

IANSA: In relation to the current law, what are the main advantages of the Disarmament Statute?

Bandeira: The existing law had a lot of loopholes. For example, police could purchase up to six guns at wholesale prices and did not have to register them with the national authorities, just with their own battalion. It was very easy for them to sell these guns off illegally. The Disarmament Statute ends this unjustified privilege, making police and security agents subject to much the same regulations as the general population. The new law helps align Brazilian gun legislation with other countries whose levels of armed violence are substantially lower. For example, it makes it illegal for most civilians to carry guns and typifies the crime of arms trafficking – the first law to do so in South America; it also establishes control over brokers and punishes their illegal activities, also for the first time in the region. These measures were included in large part because the NGO community in Brazil was well informed as to what comprehensive changes would be needed in order to increase the effectiveness of the law, and we helped our government representatives understand these measures. We provided backgrounders and even drafted sample text to be included.

We believe the main victory, however, lies in the popular referendum to decide on a complete ban on all commercial gun sales to civilians. Gun laws have been kicking around in Congress since 1996, while nearly 40,000 people are killed every year by gun violence in Brazil. The population has spoken: Brazilians want tighter gun laws. The referendum is one way to make sure that our will is heard, in spite of continuing pressure on government by the gun lobby.

More on the specific measures contained in the Disarmament Statute are available here

IANSA: There has been an impressive level of civil society activity and networking around promoting this law. Can you provide some details on this?

Bandeira: What we saw in Congress and in the media was a war of information. On one hand, the lobby distributed data and information in defense of the gun industry. And they had help: the NRA sent their president to Rio to meet with Brazilian pro gun groups and help develop a strategy against the Disarmament Statute. We also know that the lobby here finances electoral campaigns of many members of Congress, and we expect that they will do so in coming elections as well. But on the other hand, NGOs who work to reduce armed violence also distributed information. We used research carried out in Brazil as well as data from other countries in the IANSA network. IANSA has been an important channel for information exchange in our work. Experiences from other countries in this field have been decisive in helping convince those who believe that disarmament is a utopian impossibility.

We worked together to organize public demonstrations throughout the country, sharing media contacts and providing information and advice to one another. Marches have been held in Rio, Recife, São Paulo, Brasilia, Maceio, Aracaju, and Curitiba, and others are being planned. By participating in each other’s activities, we helped send the message that disarmament is a national concern with backing throughout the country.

At the same time, we worked as a network to develop a document with NGO suggestions to improve the text of the Disarmament Statute, as well as a specialist sign-on letter in support of the new law. In the end, we were able to use our information and our numbers to overcome the money and influence of the gun lobby.

IANSA: It appears that the Brazilian pro-gun lobby (called the “trigger voting block”) was left considerably weakened by this flow of information. Can you elaborate on the communications strategy used by NGOs?

Bandeira: In general, parliamentarians are not arms specialists, and so they need our information to define their opinions and to ground their positions and proposals in real data. In the debates in Congress, information provided by gun control NGOs and the pro-gun lobby was nearly always different, contradictory. This shows the importance of this work. Our informational material was better documented and more convincing; it revealed gun lobby’s data to be a house of cards, easy to knock down because it had no strong foundation. But our work was not a simple question of distributing information. Our advocacy strategy included meeting with parliamentarians and their assistants, noting their positions and working with them to influence their opinions. We also did a lot of work with the media, writing articles, participating in televised debates, and creating events to make the issue “news”, like the marches that have been held all over Brazil.

These demonstrations continue, as we need to keep the pressure up on our government representatives to push this legislation through. Just before the vote in Congress, a national public opinion poll showed that 74% of Brazilians are in favor of disarmament – we’ve got to keep reminding our representatives that the great majority of us want tighter gun laws. The first march, held in Rio, had the support of more than 50,000 people who turned up despite heavy rains that day. The importance of the media was evident here. TV Globo, the most popular channel in Brazil, supported the movement, showing characters discussing gun violence and the Disarmament Statute as part of the script on the show. Even the march itself was woven into the plot of the program. This helped push forward the national debate.

For more on the Gun Free Brazil marches, click here

IANSA: What are the next steps for Brazilians NGOs? What will be your action focus in the coming weeks and months?

Bandeira: First we need to make sure that the law is voted quickly in the Senate and that essential wording is restored to the text of the law, such as the date for the national referendum, which had to be removed in order for the law to pass in Congress. Once the Disarmament Statute is approved and regulated, we will need to get ready for an intense national public awareness campaign to prepare for the referendum on banning gun sales to civilians. We are optimistic about this, in spite of the power and resources of the gun lobby, because the majority of the population supports disarmament. We know that the new “globalised” pro-gun lobby will play tough, and we will need more than ever the support of IANSA and others who work against gun violence throughout the world.

IANSA: Can you comment on lessons learned our conclusions that would serve to inform other activists involved in processes of changing legislation?

Bandeira: It is fundamental to have good data and research, from reliable sources, in order to convince parliamentarians and the media of the need for tighter gun laws. It is essential that we understand that we must work, and know how to work efficiently, with governments, with different sectors of the government, with parliamentarians, and so on, because we depend on their decisions and the public policies they create. It is crucial to know how to mobilise the population in the streets, to demonstrate popular will, since government representatives depend on voters. It is strategic to influence and gain the respect of the media, because it can influence the mentalities of millions of people.

For more information:

Viva Rio
Sou da Paz
Desarme.org

Or write to Jessica Galeria: mercosur@iansa.org

 
 

© IANSA 1999 - 2006


Charity Web Design by sitewriters.co.uk